By Alesia Benedict, CPRW, JCTC
Steven, a computer programmer, had been laid off for six months. He finally received a job offer in a consultant capacity on a large project for a financial services company. He was thrilled to be back at work after beating the bushes for a new job for several months. A week into his new job, the HR manager called him into her office and explained during the company’s normal background checks, they had discovered he had a low credit score. She handed him a copy of their report from the credit bureau and said they were going to have to let him go. With a shaky financial background, he was not eligible to work on the project. Steven was devastated to find himself back in the job search once again.
Think this is an unusual occurrence? Think again. Employers often make a decision on a candidate during the hiring process based on his/her credit rating. The theory is people who have a great deal of extra debt or a history of poor financial management make less-than-competent workers and are higher risks for embezzlement or other illegal activities. Many people think this theory is unfair and a bill has been introduced to Congress (H.R. 3149) this year that would prevent employers (with some exceptions) from using a credit report in the hiring process.
As we head into year two of the recession, it seems it would be difficult to find anyone who has a stellar credit report, especially considering the layoffs that occurred in the first quarter of 2009. Steven and other job seekers find themselves in a no-win situation – they are behind in payments because of unemployment, but they have trouble finding a job because they are behind in payments. There is not a great deal that can be done to mitigate the debt load without a job!
Time is money in so many ways and when unemployed, time is made of platinum. The longer someone is unemployed, the more difficult the job search. The longer someone is unemployed, the worse the credit score becomes and the less funds are available. Unemployment is something that should be tackled as if it were a case of Ebola virus and had to be eradicated immediately. Waiting around and taking it easy while drawing unemployment can be deadly.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median duration of unemployment in August, 2008 was 9.5 weeks. A year later in 2009, that average had extended to 15.4 weeks. In August, 2009, 52.2 percent of unemployed workers had been unemployed for 15 weeks and a full third had been unemployed for more than 27 weeks. Those figures are reversed from a year prior when only 19.7 percent were unemployed longer than 27 weeks.
The job market today is a scenario of survival of the fittest. Watch a flock of pigeons chasing breadcrumbs and you get a mental picture of the situation: those who are aggressive get the jobs, while those who are passive get nothing. Here are some tips for conducting an aggressive job search:
Time is of the essence and not using it wisely can prove expensive. People who do not attack their job search aggressively from the very start do serious damage. The delay hurts their financial situation and that, in turn, can make finding new employment more difficult. Job search also costs money and without cash, the effectiveness of a job search is hindered. Consider this – a person making $50,000 annually averages about $25 an hour in salary. Just one week of no income costs that person $1000. Multiply that $1000 by 15 weeks! When someone walks out the door of her old employer with a pink slip in hand, what would be her reaction if someone said “You are about to lose $15,000 unless you get very aggressive in finding your next job”? It would provide a very different perspective. Use that energy to jump start your job search and turn the tides in your favor!